Posted by: Pale Rider
« on: May 20, 2024 »Let us first celebrate the life of Hieronymus Fabricius
"Fab"
aka the father of embryology, 20 May 1533 - 21 May 1619 and thus very nearly a birthday-perisher. I have no proof, but believe he has been reincarnated as Buck Angel.
Hieronymus would've loved tats like that
Say what you will about his lack of shoulders, the man expanded human knowledge.
P here, Pale Rider’s aide-de-camp. He’s taking much needed respite in an undisclosed location. The operation of NACA accounts falls within his remit as a freelance explainer of things.
I’ve checked recorded history, and nobody has ever been so naïve. In the event icowden actually thinks moNkers is engaging in good faith, we should book a RealityCheck™ appointment at his earliest convenience.
They (I use the pronoun advisedly) barely even qualify as multiple personalities. M/N is a single personality playing
Mein Tool, being an any-means-to-an-end kind of guy, naturally doesn't have a problem with whatever subterfuge is required.
Icowden, consider this an intervention: you may think you're being polite and advancing the discussion, but privately this pair of locusts must be laughing at you even as they thank you for enabling them. I respect you enough to laugh out loud.
on edit:
R here, P's long-in-the-tooth intern (not everyone gets the breaks P had in life. I have a degree in meeja studies and audited an Open University course onheteronormativity heteronyms. Look where that got me.) My instructions are to point you to the videos at the top of this page ↑↑↑ which all of us had a hand in producing. My job was to give Hitler Marilyn Monroe's hair.
P here again. No offence to R, but I'll handle this. Our post went up before the latest reply. There's a nice symmetry. Who knows, their holiday could be at the same place as Pale Rider's respite.
Fancy meeting you here
A deeper dive might ascertain the identity of this mysterious third party, but let's leave them their privacy.
Even our chromosomes like their privacy.
You wonder how some folks even breathe if they don't know for sure the exact composition of the air.
"Fab"
aka the father of embryology, 20 May 1533 - 21 May 1619 and thus very nearly a birthday-perisher. I have no proof, but believe he has been reincarnated as Buck Angel.
Hieronymus would've loved tats like that
Say what you will about his lack of shoulders, the man expanded human knowledge.
Quote from: Mein Tool
Quote from: AuroraSaabN and M seem identical... Why don't you start separate accounts?
What has that to do with anything and why is it any business of yours how somebody operates their account?
P here, Pale Rider’s aide-de-camp. He’s taking much needed respite in an undisclosed location. The operation of NACA accounts falls within his remit as a freelance explainer of things.
Quote from: icowden
I have to say that N's writing style is different and I have no issue with Monkers and N being two different people. She has explained this in detail and given us some of N's background.
I’ve checked recorded history, and nobody has ever been so naïve. In the event icowden actually thinks moNkers is engaging in good faith, we should book a RealityCheck™ appointment at his earliest convenience.
Quote from: icowden to monkers. I mean N.
Thank you for sharing your story.
They (I use the pronoun advisedly) barely even qualify as multiple personalities. M/N is a single personality playing
peekaboo.
In case you missed it the first time around. I've updated this reprint.
moNkers is also Steph, active on YACF. [See small print below.]
- Both are very prolific.
- Steph is a writer of bad fiction.
- MoNkers is a character created by Steph on the main CycleChat site back in 2020, mostly active on a thread for the musings of the retired. My theory is that this was a writing exercise/daydream for Steph, until conversations on a certain topic really started taking off, whereupon he redirected his energies.
- Steph has a DSD, which he uses as ammunition to claim sex isn't binary. It turns out 'N' has a DSD.
- Steph and moNkers have the same personality and MO. Both are verbose, lightning-quick to fling insult, and a briar patch for the unwary. Both are experts in their own mind.
If you've been following along, you'll know that this is moNkers & multitool's entire output, or near enough.
I certainly don't mind fictional constructs, but when used as seen over the course of the thread, it's not really on, is it.
THE SMALL PRINT, though this may depend on your browser/platform: As with my theory about Idiot Wind, I have no concrete evidence. It is, however, quite believable that the terrible two (who's counting) would branch out into another playground.
moNkers is also Steph, active on YACF. [See small print below.]
- Both are very prolific.
- Steph is a writer of bad fiction.
- MoNkers is a character created by Steph on the main CycleChat site back in 2020, mostly active on a thread for the musings of the retired. My theory is that this was a writing exercise/daydream for Steph, until conversations on a certain topic really started taking off, whereupon he redirected his energies.
- Steph has a DSD, which he uses as ammunition to claim sex isn't binary. It turns out 'N' has a DSD.
- Steph and moNkers have the same personality and MO. Both are verbose, lightning-quick to fling insult, and a briar patch for the unwary. Both are experts in their own mind.
Quote
"N here
When all else fails to disprove the truth, attempt to discredit the poster.
If you've been following along, you'll know that this is moNkers & multitool's entire output, or near enough.
I certainly don't mind fictional constructs, but when used as seen over the course of the thread, it's not really on, is it.
THE SMALL PRINT, though this may depend on your browser/platform: As with my theory about Idiot Wind, I have no concrete evidence. It is, however, quite believable that the terrible two (who's counting) would branch out into another playground.
[close]
Mein Tool, being an any-means-to-an-end kind of guy, naturally doesn't have a problem with whatever subterfuge is required.
Icowden, consider this an intervention: you may think you're being polite and advancing the discussion, but privately this pair of locusts must be laughing at you even as they thank you for enabling them. I respect you enough to laugh out loud.
on edit:
R here, P's long-in-the-tooth intern (not everyone gets the breaks P had in life. I have a degree in meeja studies and audited an Open University course on
Quote from: moNkers
Alas the weekend is over. N is briefly in London, and then on her way back home to Europe later today. She is not back here until the 7th, and then the three of us are straight off on holiday.
P here again. No offence to R, but I'll handle this. Our post went up before the latest reply. There's a nice symmetry. Who knows, their holiday could be at the same place as Pale Rider's respite.
Fancy meeting you here
A deeper dive might ascertain the identity of this mysterious third party, but let's leave them their privacy.
Quote from: moNkers
Most people don't even know their own sexQuote from: sane personReally?
Yup. What are your chromosomes? I presume mine are XX, but not having had them tested, I can't say for sure.
Even our chromosomes like their privacy.
You wonder how some folks even breathe if they don't know for sure the exact composition of the air.
